Current:Home > NewsRuling keeps abortion question on ballot in South Dakota -FundTrack
Ruling keeps abortion question on ballot in South Dakota
View
Date:2025-04-15 02:18:58
A state court judge’s ruling Monday keeps an abortion-rights question on the November ballot in South Dakota.
Judge John Pekas dismissed a lawsuit filed by an anti-abortion group, Life Defense Fund, that sought to have the question removed even though supporters turned in more than enough valid signatures to put it on the ballot.
“They have thrown everything they could dream up to stop the people of South Dakota from voting on this matter,” Adam Weiland, co-founder of Dakotans for Health, said in a statement after the ruling. “This is another failed effort by a small group opposed to giving women the option to terminate pregnancies caused by rape and incest or to address dangerous pregnancies affecting the life and health of women.”
Republican Rep. Jon Hansen, who is a co-chair of the Life Defense Fund, and a lawyer for the group did not immediately return messages from The Associated Press on Monday.
South Dakota is one of 14 states now enforcing a ban on abortion at every stage of pregnancy, a possibility the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door to in 2022, when it overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the nationwide right to abortion.
The amendment supported by Dakotans for Health would bar the state from regulating “a pregnant woman’s abortion decision and its effectuation” in the first trimester, but it would allow second-trimester regulations “only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman.”
Since Roe was overturned, all seven statewide abortion-related ballot measures have gone the way abortion-rights groups wanted them to.
This year, similar questions are on the ballots in five states, plus a New York equal rights question that would ban discrimination based on “pregnancy outcomes,” among other factors.
Advocates are waiting for signatures to be verified to get questions on the ballot this year in four more states, including Nebraska, where there could be competing questions on abortion rights before voters.
veryGood! (94)
Related
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Lion sighted in Chad national park for first time in nearly 20 years
- The James Webb telescope reaches its final destination in space, a million miles away
- You might still have time to buy holiday gifts online and get same-day delivery
- Trump's 'stop
- Thousands of Americans still trying to escape Sudan after embassy staff evacuated
- Younger's Nico Tortorella Welcomes Baby With Bethany C. Meyers
- Justice Department asks Congress for more authority to give proceeds from seized Russian assets to Ukraine
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Kelly Clarkson Shares Her Kids’ Heartbreaking Reaction to Brandon Blackstock Divorce
Ranking
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Facebook bans 7 'surveillance-for-hire' companies that spied on 50,000 users
- Dame Edna creator Barry Humphries dies at 89
- Pentagon considers sending contingent of troops to Port Sudan to help remaining American citizens amid war
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Review: 'Horizon Forbidden West' brings a personal saga to a primal post-apocalypse
- Kate Bosworth and Justin Long Spark Engagement Rumors at Vanity Fair Oscars 2023 After-Party
- How subsidies helped Montreal become the Hollywood of video games
Recommendation
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Whodunit at 'The Afterparty' plus the lie of 'Laziness'
Inside Pregnant Rumer Willis’ Baby Shower With Demi Moore, Emma Heming and Sisters
Uber adds passengers, food orders amid omicron surge
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
4 of the biggest archeological advancements of 2021 — including one 'game changer'
Ukraine says government websites and banks were hit with denial of service attack
Facebook bans 7 'surveillance-for-hire' companies that spied on 50,000 users